Implementing improvement is a key role of any supervisor or manager. And the simple use of brainstorming to generate ideas and engagement can be a good generator of motivation and teamwork. Here is a simple tool for improving your brainstorming to frame ideas for implementation.
First, remember this simple concept:
“Nobody ever washes a rental car!”
Anything that involves organizational change and improvement will require a sense of ownership involvement. If one is to expect anything to happen, we must insure that there is buy-in and that will come from active participation and engagement. But how do we actually generate this sense of ownership? Surely, it will not come when we tell people what to do — that only generates resistance or push-back (or compliance). It does not involve and engage them in any meaningful way even if they understand the reasons why those changes are being made.
One too often hears that we need to “empower” the people to actually go out and do something. Well, I strongly disagree with that possibly actually happening – how does one empower anyone to actually DO anything if they simply do not want to do it? Coercive measures are not an acceptable alternative in most situations. Being empowered is the choice of the others — you cannot empower them!
(Note: We can generate behavior change by altering the mechanism by which people get feedback on their performance. That is a much better option than working with any kind of extrinsic reward system. Read more about that here.)
At the same time, many factors and 30 years of experience lead me to believe that there are a variety of opportunities for workplace improvement among individuals and among small groups, there simply for the asking. There is a strong general motivation to make improvements if people feel the gap between what happens now and what could or should be happening. Cognitive Dissonance is but one framework that supports this framework of generating intrinsic motivation for improvement.
(You can also see a great animation of the concept of DRIVE, as framed by Dan Pink – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc )
But in the workplace in general, and especially in today’s risk-averse and “job enhanced” environments, the real key to rolling forward is not something like feedback or empowerment; I think Dis-Un-Empowerment is what managers need to address. We can involve and engage people and help them to identify issues and deal with the implementation of processes that help them manage roadblocks.
Generally, all of us make choices all through each day as to what we will do or not do. We will often choose NOT to do something because we perceive difficulties or perceived roadblocks (example: “He won’t support that idea because he did not support the last idea I had…”).
Most people can think of LOTS of roadblocks that would get in the way of implementing ideas for improvement (“It might be against policy.” “There probably won’t be any support / resources for that.” “We’ve not done anything like that before.” “We tried it and it didn’t work years ago.”)
One key role of engagement (and management and coaching) is to act to REMOVE the perceived or potential roadblocks that are un-empowering to people acting individually or in groups. That can be accomplished by getting pre-ordained support from managers not in the workshop, having managers come into the training session to hear the ideas and manage the roadblocks (and have THEIR roadblocks managed – we know from lots of experiences that many managers and supervisors are more roadblocked than their people!) and for the change agent to have a very good background understanding of what can be done and how it can be accomplished.
One of the things we miss today are trainers with the extensive background in how to implement and then measure the effectiveness of the training in workplace improvement initiatives. We used to call that “performance management.” There are many factors operating there including pressures of time and cost, which is one of the reasons that outside consultants can often get things accomplished when inside support people cannot — they also have the power of money and top management support behind them. But that is just a limitation and not a roadblock for good internal consultants.
Knowing how the most successful PAST improvements were implemented will give good insight into how the next FUTURE improvement might be implemented. There are cultural keys that offer perspective on these kinds of things.
So, how do we get the best results from brainstorming ideas?
Creating a gap between how things are now (Square Wheels thumping and bumping along) and how things could be operating (Round Wheels already exist) is a motivational force. And defining an implementation strategy for making small and continuous changes and improvements clarifies responsibilities often making change and improvement very doable.
But the real key is generating a feeling of ownership involvement. Too many people “rent” their time to an organization and go through the motions of maintaining their employment, rather than buying in to improve workplace improvement. The statistics on engagement and on “ready to leave for a new job elsewhere” are pretty discouraging when viewed from a position of leadership…
Yet most people do want to make a positive impact on the work they do and the workplace around them. They WANT things to be better, if we will let them do so. But they feel little ownership. According to a November 2011 analysis of its database of 5,700 employers representing 5 million employees, human resources consulting firm Aon Hewitt reported that engagement levels indicate the workforce is by and large indifferent to organizational success or failure. (I address this in a more recent article on Presenteeism.)
Un-Engagement should concern all of us interested in productivity, people and performance.
You can read more about Dis-Un-Engagement by searching the blog. Another article is here. And here is an article on ownership.
What we CAN do is a better job of asking for ideas and generating possibilities for improvement from employees’ ideas. If they feel that they have a part in the issues and involvement in designing solutions, their involvement level will increase. Here are some suggestions and alternatives to simply doing what we do and generating the same results:
1 – Discuss the roadblocks that they feel are getting in the way of improving their performance. (You can find a number of articles of mine around different approaches here.)
2 – Ask them how to improve profitability. It is common that many people do not really consider costs and impacts on a daily basis and asking them to look at these issues might generate some good discussions about the purpose of their efforts in the overall organization.
3 – Discuss the impacts of other organizations on their ability to get things done. While this often tends toward the negative issues, there will also be some positive ones if you probe for them. Best practices of certain individuals in other departments will be seen and can be reinforced. Focusing on what is positive can help you build a better working relationship with other managers, for example, while you also look to address improvement issues.
4 – Get them to “Step Back” and look at their operations as if they were brand new employees and have them comment about what is not clear and what best practices might exist. Or, you can set this up as an accomplishment and chain backwards for things that were improved: “It is 2020 and our department was judged Best in the Business! What did we do that got us that recognition?” This approach tends to minimize roadblocks in their perceptions, since results were fait accompli.
Understand that it is impossible for a manager to have all the answers or to know all the issues. The workplace is really complicated and all sorts of things change on a regular basis. Plus, some people will construct better ways of doing things — Best Practices — that can be identified and shared throughout your workplace. Improvements can be generated by peer support for change.
And think about this:
—
For the FUN of It!
Dr. Scott Simmerman is a designer of team building games and organization improvement tools.
Managing Partner of Performance Management Company since 1984, he is an experienced presenter and consultant who is trying to retire!! He now lives in Cuenca, Ecuador.
You can reach Scott at scott@squarewheels.com
Learn more about Scott at his LinkedIn site.
Square Wheels® is a registered trademark of Performance Management Company
Square Wheels images © Performance Management Company, 1993 – 2023. All rights reserved.
0 Comments